You Vote: Will SCOTUS ruling on injunctions end the attempts by judges to block Trump's orders?

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday found that the lower courts likely lacked the authority to impose universal injunctions and instead limited them to protect the plaintiff parties.

Published: June 27, 2025 7:58pm

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday found that the lower courts likely lacked the authority to impose universal injunctions and instead limited them to protect the plaintiff parties.

"The issuance of a universal injunction can be justified only as an exercise of equitable authority, yet Congress has granted federal courts no such power," wrote Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch joined her opinion. Associate Justice Clarence Thomas concurred.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in her opinion for the majority, issued a scathing rebuke of Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, asserting she sought an "imperial judiciary" and that her views ran afoul of more than 200 years of precedent.

Will SCOTUS ruling on nationwide injunctions end the attempts by judges to block Trump's orders?

Yes, the lower court judges will back off their injunctions as a result of the SCOTUS ruling
7% (438 votes)
No, the lower court judges will change and limit their rulings to only apply to the case before them
7% (442 votes)
No, they will revert to class action lawsuits, an opening the SCOTUS ruling gave them
49% (3035 votes)
No, the lower court judges will largely ignore the SCOTUS ruling and attempt to enforce their original ruling
37% (2330 votes)
Total votes: 6245

 

 

The Facts Inside Our Reporter's Notebook

Links

Just the News Spotlight

Support Just the News